Toyota 4Runner Toyota 4Runner 2008 Ford Ranger Ford Ranger 2003

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Toyota 4Runner (2008) vs. Ford Ranger (2003) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2008 Toyota 4Runner and 2003 Ford Ranger specs.

2008 Toyota 4Runner and 2003 Ford Ranger Specifications

Model Year 2008 2003  
Model Toyota 4Runner Ford Ranger  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in (over 1 rows) 0 in

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Toyota 4Runner

2008 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
not enough leg room see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
This is a vehicle designed for people 5 fett 11 inches and under - no two ways about it. If you are 5 feel 11 or over you will not enjoy this truck. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
The consequence of reducing overall height while maintaining trail worthy obstacle clearance is a relatively low to floor seating position more attune to sedans. Seats are comfortable though even for a big framed person. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Seat position low to floor leaves you sitting with a knee high position. Seats itself are comfortable, but there is no space for your feet under the front seats. All floor surfaces are almost flat though considering it truck roots. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Not a power seat. Cannot get it into an optimum adjustment. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic RWD
No third row, cargo space small see full Toyota 4Runner review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Ranger

2003 Ford Ranger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2004 2dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range
The jump seats in a Ranger are not very practical for long trips what so ever, not much room other than for storage, and they are not comfortable. I think that a Full 4 door model of the Ranger would be great, maybe a redesign will incorporate a backseat see full Ford Ranger review
2002 4dr Extended Cab 6ft bed 207-horsepower 4.0L V6
5-speed manual 4WD, part-time w/low range
The rear seats are very small but I did not buy it for rear seat comfort. I actually removed the seats to get more storage space behind the front seats. see full Ford Ranger review
 
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.