| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota 4Runner and 2012 Ford Taurus Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Ford Taurus | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,868 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,823 mm | 5,154 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,935 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,816 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,996 kg | 1,821 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 91 L | 76 L | 15 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 991 mm | 7 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,064 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 960 mm | 20 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 968 mm | -132 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 0 mm | 871 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 0 mm | 744 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 569 L | -314 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 20.1 | -19.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 20.1 | -18.1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota 4Runner
| 2011 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Taurus
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Sedan 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Three adult room in the back seat - comfortably! see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 Ford Taurus Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The front seats are horrible- similar to airline seats, and no amount of adjusting or adding cushions helped. I'm 6'2 and my wife is 5'3.and neither of us could get comfortable. After 2 weeks, it was actually painful to drive this car. see full Ford Taurus review |
| 2012 | 0 263-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Not enough headroom for adults in the rear seat. Seat comfort is as poor as the front seats. see full Ford Taurus review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
