Toyota 4Runner (2007) vs. GMC Terrain (2018) Specs

vs.

◆

2007 Toyota 4Runner and 2018 GMC Terrain Specifications

Model Year	2007	2018
Model	Toyota 4Runner	GMC Terrain
Engine	4.7L V8 DOHC-4v 260 hp@5400 306 lb-ft@3400	turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 252 hp@5500 260 lb-ft@2500
Transmission	5-speed automatic	9-speed shiftable automatic
Drivetrain	AWD w/low range	4WD
Body	4dr SUV	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	109.8 in	107.3 in	2.5 in
Length	189.2 in	182.3 in	6.9 in
Width	75.2 in	72.4 in	2.8 in
Height	69.3 in	65.4 in	3.9 in
Curb Weight	4505 lb.	3756 lb.	749 lb.
Fuel Capacity	23.0 gal.	14.9 gal.	8.1 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	39.7 in	40.0 in	-0.3 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	58.0 in	57.2 in	0.8 in
Hip Room, Row 1	55.3 in	54.4 in	0.9 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.8 in	40.9 in	0.9 in
Headroom, Row 2	39.1 in	38.5 in	0.6 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	57.2 in	55.6 in	1.6 in
Hip Room, Row 2	55.4 in	51.8 in	3.6 in
Legroom, Row 2	34.6 in	39.7 in	-5.1 in
Headroom, Row 3	32.9 in	0.0 in	32.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 3	56.7 in	0.0 in	56.7 in
Hip Room, Row 3	48.4 in	0.0 in	48.4 in
Legroom, Row 3	24.1 in	0.0 in	24.1 in
Total Legroom	100.5 in (over 3 rows)	80.6 in (over 2 rows)	19.9 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	12.0 ft³	29.6 ft³	-17.6 ft³
Cargo Volume, Behind R2	36.6 ft³	29.6	7 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	75.1 ft³	63.3 ft³	11.8 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Toyota 4Runner

2007 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2006	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	Lots of room in the backs seat, and actually decent 3rd row seating for the kids. Kills the cargo area though. see full Toyota 4Runner review

2007 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2008	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	not enough leg room see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	This is a vehicle designed for people 5 fett 11 inches and under - no two ways about it. If you are 5 feel 11 or over you will not enjoy this truck. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	The consequence of reducing overall height while maintaining trail worthy obstacle clearance is a relatively low to floor seating position more attune to sedans. Seats are comfortable though even for a big framed person. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	Seat position low to floor leaves you sitting with a knee high position. Seats itself are comfortable, but there is no space for your feet under the front seats. All floor surfaces are almost flat though considering it truck roots. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	No third row, cargo space small see full Toyota 4Runner review
2007	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	Not a power seat. Cannot get it into an optimum adjustment. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2006	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range	After a trip to TX from CO my back was hurting. see full Toyota 4Runner review
2006	4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD	the front seat is too close to the floor. see full Toyota 4Runner review

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

2018 GMC Terrain Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2018	The first-generation GMC Terrain took advantage of a long, 112.5-inch wheelbase to offer exceptional rear legroom--nearly 40 inches of it. On paper, the 2018 Terrain has only a half-inch less combined legroom despite a wheelbase shrink of 5.2 inches (to better align the vehicle with competitors and open up space for the downsized Acadia). In reality, rear legroom seems ample but no longer outstanding. The rear seats in the Honda CR-V and Toyota RAV4 are similarly roomy. But the Terrain does pull ahead when evaluating rear seat comfort. Its high-mounted rear seat cushion provides better leg support than others. The Compass's rear seat is lower and firmer. The Terrain's rear seat can even recline a little. Based on their specs, the Jeep is nearly as roomy inside as the GMC. Headroom, shoulder room, and combined legroom specs all differ by less than an inch. In reality, the Jeep's interior feels significantly narrower. And the Jeep Cherokee? All of its interior specs are also within an inch of the Terrain's, though often in the other direction. Why does Jeep offer two crossovers so close in size? This isn't clear. In terms of specs, they differ most in combined legroom and cargo volume. The Cherokee has 1.3 inches more of the former--good to have, but hardly justification for an additional model--and about ten percent LESS of the latter. How can the larger Jeep have less cargo volume? I suspect that the Compass was measured more creatively, and cannot actually hold as much cargo. Based on their specs--and I always take cargo volume specs with more than a little salt--the new Terrain can swallow a few more cubic feet of cargo than the Compass (63.3 vs. 59.8) but falls well short of the RAV4 (70.6 in hybrid form, 73.4 otherwise). A Honda CR-V can fit a couple more cubes than the RAV4. The GMC Terrain and the Jeeps compensate for not having the most spacious cargo areas with front passenger seats that fold forward. If your cargo is long but not wide, one of these is the way to go. Though closely related to the GMC, the Chevrolet Equinox does not offer this feature. see full GMC Terrain review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 GMC Terrain.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs

See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.