| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Toyota 4Runner and 2016 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,530 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,823 mm | 4,064 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,702 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,816 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,996 kg | 1,140 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 91 L | 40 L | 51 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,003 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 953 mm | 27 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,146 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 998 mm | -162 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 0 mm | 871 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 0 mm | 744 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,050 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 470 L | -215 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 16.6 | -15.6 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 1,492 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota 4Runner
| 2012 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
| 2016 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The new Honda Fit's first row has a a few more inches of elbow room than those in the Versa Note and Fiesta. Consequently, it feels like a larger car--unless you also need leg room. Then it's no better than the Nissan. Drivers with long legs will wish the front seat could slide back farther--but this would cramp the magic style of the rear seat. Even drivers of middling height (e.g. me) might find the driver seat uncomfortable. The headrest and non-adjustable lumbar bulge both jut well forward. Depending on your personal size and shape, this might or might not be an issue. Pay close attention before you buy. see full Honda Fit review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Honda Fit.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
