| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota 4Runner and 2018 Kia Cadenza Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2018 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Kia Cadenza | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,855 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,823 mm | 4,971 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,869 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,816 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,948 kg | 1,648 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 91 L | 70 L | 21 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,021 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,156 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 963 mm | 17 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 945 mm | -109 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 0 mm | 871 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 0 mm | 744 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,101 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 453 L | -198 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 16.0 | -15 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 16.0 | -14 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota 4Runner
| 2010 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Kia Cadenza
| 2018 Kia Cadenza Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2017 | Due to its shorter greenhouse and taller, more intrusive center console, the Buick's front row doesn't feel nearly as roomy as the Kia's, or even as roomy as the related Chevrolet Malibu's. Large sedans aren't what they used to be. While in the past they were both longer and wider than midsize sedans, these days they more often than not share platforms with the latter, and thus are not significantly wider, only longer. Even in the official specs the LaCrosse has nearly an inch less front shoulder room than the "smaller" Malibu. Likewise, the Cadenza's front row dimensions are within fractions of an inch of the Optima's. If you're seeking more front seat room than in a midsize sedan, you won't find it in these cars. To be fair, midsize sedans have grown. Both the Cadenza and LaCrosse have comfortable front seats, with the Buick's cushion perhaps slightly cushier. Take a turn aggressively, though, and you're much more likely to slide off the Buick's non-bucket, as it provides hardly any lateral support. The Cadenza's bolsters are more effective. The payoff for the additional size of these largish sedans can be found in the back seat, where each offers about two inches more legroom than its junior partner. On paper, the Kia Cadenza offers only slightly more total legroom than the Buick LaCrosse. In reality, it offers much more. With the front seat positioned for my 30-inch inseam (I'm not long of leg), I had about ten inches of knee room in the Kia's back seat. The Kia's rear seat cushion is also a little more supportive and comfortable than the Buick's. Not so good: in both cars there's not enough space under the front seats for the rear seat passengers' feet, essentially robbing them of about a half-foot of legroom. This design flaw is more the rule than the exception in upscale sedans. Still, it's not right. see full Kia Cadenza review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Kia Cadenza
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Kia Cadenza.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
