| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota 4Runner and 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Engine | 4.0L V6 DOHC-4v 201 kW@5600 377 Nm@4400 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 177 kW@5500 340 Nm@1750 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 9-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,662 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,823 mm | 4,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,966 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,816 mm | 1,636 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,996 kg | 1,669 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 91 L | 70 L | 21 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,024 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,438 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,095 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 1,008 mm | 979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 907 mm | -71 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 0 mm | 871 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 0 mm | 744 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 575 L | -320 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 20.3 | -19.3 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 1,444 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota 4Runner
| 2011 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
