| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Toyota 4Runner and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,921 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,806 mm | 4,999 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,910 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,760 mm | 1,836 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,835 kg | 2,336 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 87 L | 105 L | -18 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,008 mm | 998 mm | -997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,405 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,062 mm | 1,080 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 996 mm | -3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,509 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,407 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 879 mm | 1,021 mm | 878 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 836 mm | 0 mm | 836 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,440 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,229 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 612 mm | 0 mm | 612 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,553 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,101 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 340 L | 909 L | -569 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,036 L | 32.1 | -31.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,127 L | 2,030 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota 4Runner
| 2009 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
not enough leg room see full Toyota 4Runner review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
