| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Toyota 4Runner and 2012 Lincoln MKZ Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2012 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Lincoln MKZ | |
| Engine | 4.7L V8 DOHC-4v 260 hp@5400 306 lb-ft@3400 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 263 hp@6250 249 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 107.4 in | 2.4 in |
| Length | 189.2 in | 190.6 in | -1.4 in |
| Width | 75.2 in | 72.2 in | 3 in |
| Height | 69.3 in | 56.9 in | 12.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4255 lb. | 3804 lb. | 451 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 23.0 gal. | 17.5 gal. | 5.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.7 in | 38.7 in | 1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.0 in | 57.4 in | 0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 54.0 in | 1.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 42.3 in | -0.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.1 in | 37.8 in | 1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 56.5 in | 0.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 53.3 in | 2.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.6 in | 37.1 in | -2.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 32.9 in | 0.0 in | 32.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 56.7 in | 0.0 in | 56.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.4 in | 0.0 in | 48.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 24.1 in | 0.0 in | 24.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 100.5 in (over 3 rows) | 79.4 in (over 2 rows) | 21.1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.0 ft3 | 16.5 ft3 | -4.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 36.6 ft3 | 16.5 | 20.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 75.1 ft3 | 16.5 ft3 | 58.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota 4Runner
| 2009 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 236-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
not enough leg room see full Toyota 4Runner review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | Seat evaluations are highly subjective. For me, the MKZ's standard front seats are very good, but short of outstanding. Compared to the seats in the Fusion, they're more firmly contoured but have smaller side bolsters. The optional multi-contour seats might address the bolster deficit. But few people are going to drive this car in a manner that requires much lateral support. see full Lincoln MKZ review | |
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat headroom and knee room are borderline tight in the Fusion. In the MKZ they're tighter still. Six-foot passengers might still fit, but not comfortably. Even without sufficient space for toes beneath its front seat, the Lexus ES's rear seat is far roomier. see full Lincoln MKZ review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Lincoln MKZ
| 2012 Lincoln MKZ Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
I love driving in luxury, and this car delivers much of it. From the cooled/heated seats to the delicious feel of the leather seating surfaces, this car offers more than adequate comfort...and it is a luxury automobile after all. I would expect no less from Lincoln. see full Lincoln MKZ review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
