| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Toyota 4Runner and 2013 Toyota Matrix Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2013 | |
| Model | Toyota 4Runner | Toyota Matrix | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,601 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,823 mm | 4,366 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,816 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,996 kg | 1,300 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 91 L | 50 L | 41 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,029 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,354 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,435 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,057 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 998 mm | -18 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,468 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,110 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 836 mm | 919 mm | -83 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 871 mm | 0 mm | 871 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,466 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,100 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 744 mm | 0 mm | 744 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 255 L | 561 L | -306 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,311 L | 19.8 | -18.8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,515 L | 1,741 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota 4Runner
| 2012 Toyota 4Runner Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Not wide enough for circumferentially challenged bodies. Bottom cushion too narrow, confined bolsters, not long enough under thighs. see full Toyota 4Runner review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota Matrix
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Matrix.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
