Model Year | 2014 | 2015 | |
Model | Toyota Avalon | Buick Regal | |
Engine | 2.5L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 116 kW@5700 212 Nm@4500 |
2.4L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 136 kW@6700 233 Nm@4900 |
|
Transmission | CVT | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,738 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,958 mm | 4,831 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,834 mm | 1,857 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,461 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,626 kg | 1,652 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 68 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 986 mm | -8 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 935 mm | 28 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 947 mm | 49 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,065 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 453 L | 402 L | 51 L |
2014 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Compounding the Avalon's lack of suspension compliance, its seats are also firm, yet lacking in lateral support. You very much sit on them rather than in them. On a long drive my rear end reported impinged circulation. The front passenger is even worse off, as the tilt of that seat can be adjusted only in the Limited. Rear seat passengers also complained about overly firm, insufficiently contoured cushions. see full Toyota Avalon review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Toyota Avalon.
2015 Buick Regal Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Both the Regal and 200 have much less rear seat room than the average midsize sedan. Adults up to about six feet in height will fit, but with little room to spare. see full Buick Regal review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Buick Regal.