Model Year | 2013 | 2015 | |
Model | Toyota Avalon | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | 2.5L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 156 hp@5700 156 lb-ft@4500 |
2.0L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 141 hp@6000 129 lb-ft@4000 |
|
Transmission | CVT | CVT | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,958 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,834 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,461 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,626 kg | 1,636 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 51 L | 13 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 1,041 mm | 977 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 1,001 mm | 962 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 927 mm | 69 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,065 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 453 L | 694 L | -241 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.0 | 1,489 L | 15 |
2013 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Compounding the Avalon's lack of suspension compliance, its seats are also firm, yet lacking in lateral support. You very much sit on them rather than in them. On a long drive my rear end reported impinged circulation. The front passenger is even worse off, as the tilt of that seat can be adjusted only in the Limited. Rear seat passengers also complained about overly firm, insufficiently contoured cushions. see full Toyota Avalon review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Avalon.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford C-MAX.