| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2000 Toyota Avalon and 2011 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
| Model Year | 2000 | 2011 | |
| Model | Toyota Avalon | Mazda CX-9 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Toyota Avalon
| 2000 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2000 | 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
My passengers always comment on how much leg room they have and the use of the middle, oversize arm rest that can be used on long trips. see full Toyota Avalon review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Mazda CX-9
| 2011 Mazda CX-9 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat hugs in the right places without being cumbersome. Headrest position is much better than the midsize GM vehicles I test-drove (Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia, Buick Enclave). see full Mazda CX-9 review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
