Model Year | 2013 | 2018 | |
Model | Toyota Avalon | Mazda CX-9 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,929 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,958 mm | 5,065 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,834 mm | 1,969 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,461 mm | 1,753 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,570 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 72 L | -8 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 998 mm | -20 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 978 mm | -15 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 1,001 mm | 995 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,349 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,019 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 754 mm | -754 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,065 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 453 L | 408 L | 45 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.0 | 1,082 L | 15 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.0 | 2,016 L | 14 |
2013 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Compounding the Avalon's lack of suspension compliance, its seats are also firm, yet lacking in lateral support. You very much sit on them rather than in them. On a long drive my rear end reported impinged circulation. The front passenger is even worse off, as the tilt of that seat can be adjusted only in the Limited. Rear seat passengers also complained about overly firm, insufficiently contoured cushions. see full Toyota Avalon review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Avalon.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-9.