Model Year | 2013 | 2015 | |
Model | Toyota Avalon | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,840 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,958 mm | 4,686 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,834 mm | 1,811 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,461 mm | 1,443 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,570 kg | 1,550 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 68 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 978 mm | 942 mm | 36 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,478 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 942 mm | 21 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,387 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 996 mm | 894 mm | 102 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,065 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 453 L | 357 L | 96 L |
2013 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Compounding the Avalon's lack of suspension compliance, its seats are also firm, yet lacking in lateral support. You very much sit on them rather than in them. On a long drive my rear end reported impinged circulation. The front passenger is even worse off, as the tilt of that seat can be adjusted only in the Limited. Rear seat passengers also complained about overly firm, insufficiently contoured cushions. see full Toyota Avalon review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Avalon.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mercedes-Benz C-Class.