| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2000 Toyota Avalon and 2012 Tesla Model S Specifications
| Model Year | 2000 | 2012 | |
| Model | Toyota Avalon | Tesla Model S | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2000 Toyota Avalon
| 2000 Toyota Avalon Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2000 | 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 3.0L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
My passengers always comment on how much leg room they have and the use of the middle, oversize arm rest that can be used on long trips. see full Toyota Avalon review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Tesla Model S
| 2012 Tesla Model S Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Tesla Model S are reasonably comfortable, but don't look or feel especially luxurious and provide little lateral support in turns. At least in the Performance model the side bolsters should be larger and/or adjustable. The seats in the A7 similarly need more aggressive bolsters. The seats in the S7 have them. see full Tesla Model S review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Tesla Model S
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2012 Tesla Model S.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
