Toyota C-HR (2019) vs. Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban (2014) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2019 Toyota C-HR and 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban specs.
2019 Toyota C-HR and 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
Model Year |
2019 |
2014 |
|
Model |
Toyota C-HR |
Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,639 mm |
2,946 mm |
0 mm |
Length |
4,348 mm |
5,131 mm |
-1 mm |
Width |
1,796 mm |
2,007 mm |
-1 mm |
Height |
1,565 mm |
1,953 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,497 kg |
2,471 kg |
-1 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
50 L |
98 L |
-48 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
968 mm |
1,044 mm |
967 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,245 mm |
1,659 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,346 mm |
1,636 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,105 mm |
1,049 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
973 mm |
996 mm |
-23 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,334 mm |
1,656 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,219 mm |
1,539 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
805 mm |
991 mm |
-186 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
963 mm |
-963 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,567 mm |
-1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,247 mm |
-1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
650 mm |
-650 mm |
Total Legroom |
1,910 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,690 mm (over 3 rows) |
-1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
538 L |
479 L |
59 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
19.0 |
1,708 L |
18 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
1,031 L |
3,084 L |
-2 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Toyota C-HR
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Toyota C-HR.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
2015 |
Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive.
The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition).
Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it.
In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result.
The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's.
see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all
Toyota models.