Model Year | 2018 | 2014 | |
Model | Toyota C-HR | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
Engine | 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 107 kW@6100 188 Nm@3900 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 177 kW@5500 340 Nm@1750 |
|
Transmission | 7-speed shiftable CVT | 9-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,639 mm | 2,662 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,348 mm | 4,356 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,796 mm | 1,966 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,565 mm | 1,636 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,497 kg | 1,669 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 70 L | -20 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 968 mm | 1,024 mm | 967 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,245 mm | 1,438 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,105 mm | 1,095 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 1,008 mm | 972 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,334 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,219 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 805 mm | 907 mm | -102 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,910 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,002 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 538 L | 575 L | -37 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,031 L | 1,444 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Toyota C-HR.
2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.