| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Toyota Camry and 2013 BMW X1 Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2013 | |
| Model | Toyota Camry | BMW X1 | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 200 kW@6200 336 Nm@4700 |
turbocharged 3.0L I6 DOHC-4v 224 kW@5800 407 Nm@1300 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,849 mm | 4,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,821 mm | 1,798 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,569 kg | 1,765 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 64 L | 63 L | 1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,049 mm | 985 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,384 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 968 mm | 1,008 mm | 967 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,438 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,384 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 886 mm | 102 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,045 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,938 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 436 L | 419 L | 17 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.4 | 1,351 L | 14.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Camry
| 2016 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Camry's rear seat isn't quite as roomy as the Accord's but it's close, and both are much roomier than the Ford's. The rear seat cushions in all three sedans are high enough to provide decent thigh support for adults. Missed in the Camry Hybrid SE, though: a rear air vent. If you want one, you'll need a higher trim level--or one of the competitors. see full Toyota Camry review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Camry
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Camry.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X1
| 2013 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | BMW makes great sport seats, with support in the right places and power-adjustable side bolsters. This said, those in the X1 Sport Line feel less cushy, and so less overtly comfortable, than I recall from other BMWs. The Evoque's front buckets lack adjustable side bolsters, but feel more luxurious. While the BMW wins on support, the Land Rover wins on comfort. Another tie. Update: when I later had an Evoque for a week its seats felt less comfortable than they had during the dealer test drive. So I'm revising this rating in favor of the BMW. see full BMW X1 review | |
| 2013 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The BMW X1's interior dimensions also closely resemble those of the previous-generation 3-Series. Up front, there's a little less space to stretch out than in the X3. But abundant headroom. About half of the X1's additional height is over one's head--you sit only a couple inches higher than in the 3-Series. This additional airspace also distinguishes the X1 from the allroad. Rear seat room could be more of an issue. As in the old 3 and the new allroad, a couple of average-sized adults will fit behind a couple more with perhaps an inch or two of clearance for their knees, while a third would be a squeeze. The seat back reclines, but the seat cushion is too low to provide good thigh support. The Evoque is similarly a less-than-ideal choice for four-plus adults taking a long trip. see full BMW X1 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X1
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW X1.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
