| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota Camry and 2013 Chevrolet Cruze Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2013 | |
| Model | Toyota Camry | Chevrolet Cruze | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,685 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,806 mm | 4,597 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,821 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,480 kg | 1,407 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 59 L | 11 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 998 mm | -12 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,387 mm | 1,346 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,072 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 960 mm | 963 mm | -3 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,331 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 899 mm | 74 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 425 L | 436 L | -11 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Camry
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Cruze
| 2013 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2012 | The Cruze's rear seat is among the tightest in a compact sedan, and the diesel engine doesn't affect this. Though rear seat headroom is abundant, adults will feel a bit cramped even behind a driver of average height. The Jetta's rear seat has a little less headroom but far more legroom. So the best option depends on whether your rear seat passengers have long legs or long torsos. see full Chevrolet Cruze review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Cruze
| 2013 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Sedan 138-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat legroom is a bit tight with the front seats fully back. see full Chevrolet Cruze review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 138hp 1.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Unfortunately there is no leg room in the rear of the car when the front seats are a particular distant from the dashboard. So either all the people when riding in this car need to be small people like no more then 5 foot?! or you can only have two 6 foot people in it at a time. needs serious improvements there! see full Chevrolet Cruze review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
