| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota Camry and 2017 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2017 | |
| Model | Toyota Camry | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 114.8 in | -5.5 in |
| Length | 189.2 in | 195.5 in | -6.3 in |
| Width | 71.7 in | 74.7 in | -3 in |
| Height | 57.9 in | 57.9 in | 0 in |
| Curb Weight | 3263 lb. | 3997 lb. | -734 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -0.3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 38.7 in | 0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.8 in | 59.1 in | -1.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.6 in | 57.2 in | -2.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.7 in | 42.3 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 38.0 in | -0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.9 in | 59.0 in | -2.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 53.9 in | 58.0 in | -4.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 39.7 in | -1.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 80 in (over 2 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | -2 in |
| Cargo Volume | 15.0 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | -1.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Camry
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
