| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota Camry and 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota Camry | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 200 kW@6200 336 Nm@4700 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 265 kW@5600 519 Nm@4100 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,806 mm | 5,182 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,821 mm | 2,045 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,890 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,570 kg | 2,479 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 70 L | 98 L | -28 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,087 mm | 985 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,468 mm | 1,646 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,387 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,151 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 960 mm | 983 mm | -23 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,445 mm | 1,654 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,532 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 973 mm | 991 mm | -18 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 968 mm | -968 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,590 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,252 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 630 mm | -630 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,771 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 425 L | 433 L | -8 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.0 | 1,461 L | 14 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.0 | 2,682 L | 13 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Camry
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
