Model Year | 2020 | 2018 | |
Model | Toyota Camry | Mazda CX-9 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,824 mm | 2,929 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,879 mm | 5,065 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,839 mm | 1,969 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,445 mm | 1,753 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,470 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 72 L | -11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 973 mm | 998 mm | -25 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,466 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 978 mm | -13 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,458 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 1,001 mm | 964 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 899 mm | -899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,349 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,019 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 754 mm | -754 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,035 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,797 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 428 L | 408 L | 20 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.1 | 1,082 L | 14.1 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.1 | 2,016 L | 13.1 |
2020 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The rear seat is similarly meh. Passengers back there will encounter a decent amount of legroom (much more than in the Mazda6), but (unless they have very short legs) insufficient thigh support and (if they're of above-average height) the headliner. This last is the price of the current Camry's racier roof line. Perhaps they figure people who require a roomy rear seat will buy a crossover. To be fair, many manufacturers have been sacrificing rear seat headroom for a more stylish roof line, as this seems the best way for sedans to retain appeal in a market hot for crossovers. see full Toyota Camry review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Toyota Camry.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Mazda CX-9.