| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2020 Toyota Camry and 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2020 | 2009 | |
| Model | Toyota Camry | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,824 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,879 mm | 4,630 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,839 mm | 1,770 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,445 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,470 kg | 1,600 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 66 L | -5 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 973 mm | 942 mm | 31 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,466 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,328 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 937 mm | 28 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,415 mm | 1,400 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,389 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 848 mm | 117 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,035 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,908 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 428 L | 351 L | 77 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Toyota Camry
| 2020 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The rear seat is similarly meh. Passengers back there will encounter a decent amount of legroom (much more than in the Mazda6), but (unless they have very short legs) insufficient thigh support and (if they're of above-average height) the headliner. This last is the price of the current Camry's racier roof line. Perhaps they figure people who require a roomy rear seat will buy a crossover. To be fair, many manufacturers have been sacrificing rear seat headroom for a more stylish roof line, as this seems the best way for sedans to retain appeal in a market hot for crossovers. see full Toyota Camry review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2020 Toyota Camry
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Toyota Camry.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
just ok see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
too tight back there. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
