Toyota Camry (2010) vs. Subaru Forester (2006) Specs

vs.

◆

2010 Toyota Camry and 2006 Subaru Forester Specifications

Model Year	2010	2006
Model	Toyota Camry	Subaru Forester
Engine	3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 268 hp@6200 248 lb-ft@4700	turbocharged 2.5L H4 DOHC-4v 230 hp@5600 235 lb-ft@3600
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	4-speed automatic
Drivetrain	FWD	AWD
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	109.3 in	99.4 in	9.9 in
Length	189.2 in	176.6 in	12.6 in
Width	71.7 in	68.3 in	3.4 in
Height	57.9 in	65.0 in	-7.1 in
Curb Weight	3461 lb.	3350 lb.	111 lb.
Fuel Capacity	18.5 gal.	15.9 gal.	2.6 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.8 in	39.8 in	-1 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	57.8 in	53.5 in	4.3 in
Hip Room, Row 1	54.6 in	51.6 in	3 in
Legroom, Row 1	41.7 in	43.6 in	-1.9 in
Headroom, Row 2	37.8 in	39.7 in	-1.9 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	56.9 in	53.6 in	3.3 in
Hip Room, Row 2	53.9 in	51.6 in	2.3 in
Legroom, Row 2	38.3 in	33.7 in	4.6 in
Total Legroom	80 in (over 2 rows)	77.3 in (over 2 rows)	2.7 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	15.0 ft³	32.0 ft³	-17 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	15.0 ft³	57.7 ft³	-42.7 ft³

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Camry

2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review

2010 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2010	4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Subaru Forester

2006 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD	easy to find comfortable position; no problems driving over an hour or more; good upright position see full Subaru Forester review
2005	4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	There is leg room. The seat is adjustable enough. see full Subaru Forester review

2006 Subaru Forester Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2007	4dr SUV turbocharged 224hp 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	Front driver leg room is a little cramped from side to side. see full Subaru Forester review
2007	4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD	No thigh or lumbar support, seats hrad, minimal leg room for front passenger see full Subaru Forester review
2007	4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD	Not acceptable for an adult in any of the three rear seating positions see full Subaru Forester review
2006	4dr SUV 173-horsepower 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	Again, cramped and too small for larger people. see full Subaru Forester review
2006	4dr SUV turbocharged 230hp 2.5L H4 5-speed manual AWD	This is honesty the only complaint i have about the 2006 XT. The rear seat is a bit tight. We took three other adults on about a 4 hour trip and it was a tight fit - good thing we're good friends! My wife's 2009 Forester is much better in the rear legroom department. see full Subaru Forester review
2005	4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD	Rear seat is just too small, but that has been fixed for the 2009 models. The front seat, actually the cabin of the car is just a bit too narrow. It needs more elbow room. see full Subaru Forester review
2005	4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD	Not enough elbow room. see full Subaru Forester review
2005	4dr SUV 165-horsepower 2.5L H4 4-speed automatic AWD	Rear seat room is a bit tight for larger people. Car seats are a little tight in both rear and forward facing positions. see full Subaru Forester review

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.