Toyota Camry (2009) vs. Volkswagen Golf / GTI (2017) Specs

vs.

◆

2009 Toyota Camry and 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Specifications

Model Year	2009	2017
Model	Toyota Camry	Volkswagen Golf / GTI
Engine	3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 268 hp@6200 248 lb-ft@4700	turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 292 hp@5400 280 lb-ft@1800
Transmission	6-speed shiftable automatic	6-speed automated manual
Drivetrain	FWD	AWD
Body	4dr Sedan	4dr Hatch
			Difference
Wheelbase	2,776 mm	2,637 mm	0 mm
Length	4,806 mm	4,255 mm	0 mm
Width	1,806 mm	1,798 mm	0 mm
Height	1,471 mm	1,453 mm	0 mm
Curb Weight	1,570 kg	1,515 kg	0 kg
Fuel Capacity	70 L	50 L	20 L
Headroom, Row 1	986 mm	975 mm	11 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 1	1,468 mm	1,420 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 1	1,387 mm	0 mm	1 mm
Legroom, Row 1	1,059 mm	1,046 mm	0 mm
Headroom, Row 2	960 mm	968 mm	-8 mm
Shoulder Room, Row 2	1,445 mm	1,369 mm	0 mm
Hip Room, Row 2	1,369 mm	0 mm	1 mm
Legroom, Row 2	973 mm	904 mm	69 mm
Total Legroom	2,032 mm (over 2 rows)	1,951 mm (over 2 rows)	1 mm
Cargo Volume, Minimum	425 L	646 L	-221 L
Cargo Volume, Maximum	15.0	1,492 L	14

2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review
2008	4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review

2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2010	4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD	Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review
2009	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review
2008	4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD	Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review

2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Comment
2016	As I've noted before (when reviewing the e-Golf), the seventh-generation Golf's front seats are shaped and padded to provide nearly ideal comfort and support in daily driving. The CX-5's driver seat also fit me well, but not quite as well as the Volkswagen's. Compared to other compact hatchbacks and its ancestors, the current Golf has a roomy rear seat. I can sit behind my 5-9 self with about five inches of air ahead of my knees. Unless unusually tall people populate both rows, the amount of space should be beyond adequate. Compare the Golf SportWagen's rear seat to that in the CX-5, and a funny thing happens. On paper, the Mazda provides about 3.5 more inches of legroom. When sitting behind myself in both vehicles, though, I had about half as much space ahead of my knees in the CX-5. I've noticed in the past that VW measures rear legroom very conservatively, and apparently they continue to do so. The Golf's interior is roomier than the official specs suggest. Plus its rear seat passengers get air vents. The Mazda's do not. This said, I'm not entirely comfortable in the Golf SportWagen's rear seat. To me it feels overly reclined. In neither the GSW nor the CX-5 is the degree of recline adjustable. It is in some compact crossovers. see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review

2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2016	2dr Hatch turbocharged 210hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD	Difficult ingress and egress see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans

See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.