Model Year | 2013 | 2016 | |
Model | Toyota FJ Cruiser | Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,690 mm | 2,924 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,671 mm | 4,851 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,895 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,801 mm | 1,781 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,837 kg | 2,144 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 105 L | -33 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,003 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,483 mm | 1,542 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,064 mm | 1,072 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 1,024 mm | 993 mm | -992 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,295 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 795 mm | 940 mm | -145 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,859 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,012 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 790 L | 784 L | 6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,892 L | 1,761 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota FJ Cruiser.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Sport.