| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Toyota Highlander and 2014 Chevrolet SS Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2014 | |
| Model | Toyota Highlander | Chevrolet SS | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,789 mm | 2,916 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,854 mm | 4,966 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,925 mm | 1,897 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,730 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,875 kg | 1,803 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 73 L | 72 L | 1 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 983 mm | -982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,506 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,123 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,013 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,514 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,450 mm | 1,473 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 1,008 mm | 974 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,397 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,158 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 704 mm | 0 mm | 704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,802 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 391 L | 464 L | -73 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,198 L | 16.4 | -15.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,370 L | 16.4 | -14.4 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Highlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Highlander.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
