| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2023 Toyota Highlander and 2016 Dodge Charger Specifications
| Model Year | 2023 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota Highlander | Dodge Charger | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,850 mm | 3,053 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,950 mm | 5,039 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,930 mm | 1,905 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,730 mm | 1,478 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,885 kg | 1,784 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 70 L | -2 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,046 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,499 mm | 1,511 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,427 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,067 mm | 1,062 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 1,001 mm | 930 mm | -929 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,491 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,448 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 983 mm | 1,019 mm | 982 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 917 mm | 0 mm | 917 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,397 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,158 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 711 mm | 0 mm | 711 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,761 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,080 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 453 L | 456 L | -3 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,371 L | 16.1 | -15.1 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,387 L | 16.1 | -14.1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2023 Toyota Highlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2023 Toyota Highlander.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | The Road & Track package includes some of the best front seats I've experienced. The side bolsters, though not adjustable, manage to effectively hold slender drivers in place without uncomfortably constraining far-from-slender ones. Synthetic suede center panels assist in this task. Yet as performance-oriented as these seats are, they aren't overly firm, and should prove comfortable even on day-long drives. Despite the more hardcore nature of the Chevrolet SS, its front seats have much smaller, far less effective bolsters. Some synthetic suede helps to mitigate this shortcoming, but the Dodge's buckets are much better for both comfort and support. see full Dodge Charger review | |
| 2016 Dodge Charger Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The Dodge Charger's rear seat cushion is comfortably shaped and positioned. Rear knee room, though less abundant than the sedan's exterior dimensions might suggest, is neverless generous. So what is rear seat room doing among the reasons not to buy a Charger? Well, headroom is in short supply. People 5-11 and up could become painfully familiar with the backlight. Shorter passengers won't experience this issue, but could find the back seat uncomfortably confining because the smallish rear side windows descend only to neck level. For more rear headroom and larger rear side windows, check out the related Chrysler 300. Or the Chevrolet SS, which has 1.4 inches more rear headroom than the Charger. see full Dodge Charger review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Dodge Charger.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
