Model Year | 2006 | 2012 | |
Model | Toyota Highlander | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | 3.3L V6 Hybrid DOHC-4v 208 hp@5600 212 lb-ft@4400 |
1.5L I4 Hybrid OHC-4v 122 hp@6000 122 lb-ft@1000 |
|
Transmission | CVT | 6-speed manual | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 106.9 in | 95.9 in | 11 in |
Length | 184.6 in | 160.6 in | 24 in |
Width | 71.9 in | 68.5 in | 3.4 in |
Height | 67.9 in | 54.9 in | 13 in |
Curb Weight | 4070 lb. | 2637 lb. | 1433 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 19.1 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 8.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.0 in | 36.9 in | 3.1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.9 in | 53.8 in | 4.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 51.5 in | 3.6 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 42.7 in | -2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.8 in | 0.0 in | 39.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 57.0 in | 0.0 in | 57 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.9 in | 0.0 in | 54.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 36.4 in | 0.0 in | 36.4 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 32.3 in | 0.0 in | 32.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 53.2 in | 0.0 in | 53.2 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 39.8 in | 0.0 in | 39.8 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 30.2 in | 0.0 in | 30.2 in |
Total Legroom | 107.3 in (over 3 rows) | 42.7 in (over 1 rows) | 64.6 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.5 ft3 | 25.1 ft3 | -14.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 39.7 ft3 | 25.1 | 14.6 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 80.6 ft3 | 25.1 ft3 | 55.5 ft3 |
2006 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr SUV 215-horsepower 3.3L V6 5-speed automatic AWD |
Ease of entry and exit and the spacious leg room. see full Toyota Highlander review |
2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |