| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2018 Toyota Highlander and 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Specifications
| Model Year | 2018 | 2009 | |
| Model | Toyota Highlander | Mercedes-Benz C-Class | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 108.7 in | 1.1 in |
| Length | 192.5 in | 182.3 in | 10.2 in |
| Width | 75.8 in | 69.7 in | 6.1 in |
| Height | 68.1 in | 56.3 in | 11.8 in |
| Curb Weight | 4165 lb. | 3527 lb. | 638 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.2 gal. | 17.4 gal. | 1.8 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.7 in | 37.1 in | 3.6 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.3 in | 54.7 in | 4.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 52.3 in | 4.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 44.2 in | 41.7 in | 2.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.9 in | 36.9 in | 3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.6 in | 55.1 in | 4.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.1 in | 54.9 in | 2.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.4 in | 33.4 in | 5 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.9 in | 0.0 in | 35.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 55.0 in | 0.0 in | 55 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 45.6 in | 0.0 in | 45.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 27.7 in | 0.0 in | 27.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 110.3 in (over 3 rows) | 75.1 in (over 2 rows) | 35.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.8 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 | 1.4 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 42.3 ft3 | 12.4 | 29.9 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 83.7 ft3 | 12.4 ft3 | 71.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2018 Toyota Highlander
| 2018 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2018 | 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 3.5L V6 8-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
3rd row seat is midget sized. Claiming that the Highlander is an 8-passenger vehicle is a lie. It's either 5 normal-sized people, or Snow White and the 7 dwarfs. There is no way you can accommodate 8 normal-sized people comfortably in this car. see full Toyota Highlander review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
This car has a very small back seat. If you want to carry passengers for a long distance, get an E class. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Mercedes-Benz makes the best seats in the business, period. Even after a 10 hour drive, my back did not hurt. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 228-horsepower 3.0L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The seat causes no discomfort to my tailbone like many ohter cars. Furthermore, the padding is firm and feels like it will last a long time. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C-Class Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not much leg room when compared to other luxury entries. No flat floor so a 3rd passenger in the rear is not possible. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Center console and stack cut into front side leg room, my left leg is always up against the center console. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 7-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
just ok see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan supercharged 181hp 1.8L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
too tight back there. see full Mercedes-Benz C-Class review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
