| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Toyota Highlander and 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2013 | |
| Model | Toyota Highlander | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 270 hp@6200 248 lb-ft@4700 |
3.0L V6 OHC-4v 230 hp@6250 215 lb-ft@3750 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 109.8 in | 105.1 in | 4.7 in |
| Length | 188.4 in | 182.7 in | 5.7 in |
| Width | 75.2 in | 70.9 in | 4.3 in |
| Height | 68.1 in | 66.1 in | 2 in |
| Curb Weight | 4266 lb. | 3847 lb. | 419 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.2 gal. | 16.6 gal. | 2.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.6 in | 40.3 in | 0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.7 in | 56.4 in | 3.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 52.2 in | 4.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 43.2 in | 41.6 in | 1.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 40.1 in | 38.3 in | 1.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.5 in | 56.1 in | 3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 56.5 in | 51.9 in | 4.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 38.3 in | 36.8 in | 1.5 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 36.3 in | 35.4 in | 0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 55.0 in | 49.8 in | 5.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 42.3 in | 39.1 in | 3.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.2 in | 27.7 in | 1.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 110.7 in (over 3 rows) | 106.1 in (over 3 rows) | 4.6 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.3 ft3 | 14.9 ft3 | -4.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 42.3 ft3 | 36.2 ft3 | 6.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 95.4 ft3 | 72.6 ft3 | 22.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Toyota Highlander
| 2011 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
I am 6 foot tall, and there is plenty of head and leg room in the driving position. Easy access as well. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2010 | 4dr SUV 187-horsepower 2.7L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Lots of room in the second row, including seats that recline and move back & forth. Having the third row as an option for occasional use was really the deciding factor. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2011 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 3.5L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
3rd row seats are useless to me. Too little room for adults. Should have been an option for families with small children. With 3rd row seating, you lose storage space. see full Toyota Highlander review |
| 2011 | 4dr SUV 245-horsepower 3.5L V6 Hybrid CVT AWD |
Third row minimal legroom see full Toyota Highlander review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
