Toyota Highlander (2006) vs. Volvo V60 (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2006 Toyota Highlander and 2016 Volvo V60 specs.
2006 Toyota Highlander and 2016 Volvo V60 Specifications
| Model Year |
2006 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Toyota Highlander |
Volvo V60 |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr SUV |
4dr Wagon |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
2,715 mm |
2,776 mm |
0 mm |
| Length |
4,689 mm |
4,636 mm |
0 mm |
| Width |
1,826 mm |
1,864 mm |
0 mm |
| Height |
1,725 mm |
1,483 mm |
0 mm |
| Curb Weight |
1,595 kg |
1,600 kg |
0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity |
72 L |
67 L |
5 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
1,016 mm |
983 mm |
-982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,471 mm |
1,448 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,400 mm |
1,394 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
1,034 mm |
1,064 mm |
0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
1,011 mm |
950 mm |
-949 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,448 mm |
1,402 mm |
0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,394 mm |
1,359 mm |
0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
925 mm |
851 mm |
74 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 |
820 mm |
0 mm |
820 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
1,351 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 |
1,011 mm |
0 mm |
1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 |
767 mm |
0 mm |
767 mm |
| Total Legroom |
2,725 mm (over 3 rows) |
1,915 mm (over 2 rows) |
1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
297 L |
430 L |
-133 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
1,124 L |
15.2 |
-14.2 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
2,282 L |
1,240 L |
1 L |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Highlander
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
| 2015 |
The V60's interior doesn't only look comfortable. Even back in the day Volvo's cars weren't known only for safety. Many people considered their seats the best. Many still do. The V60's front seats are much cushier than those in a German car, but they are also properly supportive.
One caveat. Locate the headrest to receive top scores from the crash test dummy and it will jut too far forward for people with especially upright postures--like me. "Active headrests" that move forward if and when the car is rear-ended can sidestep this tradeoff. But the V60's active headrests do not.
The BMW's seats are much firmer, but their headrests have a fore-aft adjustment. You also sit significantly lower in the BMW, but its instrument panel isn't as deep (owing to its windshield being more upright), for a more open view forward.
Your build and impressions of either car's seats may vary.
see full Volvo V60 review |
| 2016 Volvo V60 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The Volvo V60's rear seat space also lags the BMW's. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a couple inches to spare, but subjectively the limited space seems even tighter than it is. The side window outline that appears sexy from the outside can seem confining from the inside. Large front seat headrests block the view forward. Behind a tall driver even adults of modest size will feel cramped, if they can fit at all.
The BMW wagon has a little less headroom but a couple more inches of much-needed knee room. Also, while the Volvo's cabin is a couple inches wider than the BMW's up front, and feels much roomier as a result, this advantage disappears in back.
see full Volvo V60 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Volvo V60.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
SUVsSee TrueDelta's information for all
Toyota models.
