Model Year | 2019 | 2013 | |
Model | Toyota Land Cruiser V8 | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,850 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,950 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,979 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,880 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 2,638 kg | 1,636 kg | 1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 93 L | 51 L | 42 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 973 mm | 1,041 mm | 972 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,549 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,090 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 1,001 mm | 987 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,552 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,488 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 874 mm | 927 mm | -53 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 909 mm | 0 mm | 909 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,582 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,438 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 719 mm | 0 mm | 719 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,682 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 456 L | 694 L | -238 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,218 L | 24.5 | -23.5 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,313 L | 1,489 L | 1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Toyota Land Cruiser V8.
2013 Ford C-MAX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
There's plenty of space for adults in the back seat of the C-MAX. But the seat is mounted too low to provide thigh support, and between this and the angle of the floor I could find no comfortable way to position my legs and feet. There's a huge amount of headroom, so this was not the limiting factor. Instead, the seat seems to be so low to enable a flat floor when it is folded without requiring that the seat bottom be folded separately from the seat back. Combine the low seat with a high beltline (bottom of the side windows), and children can't see out well. see full Ford C-MAX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford C-MAX.