| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2019 Toyota Land Cruiser V8 and 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Specifications
| Model Year | 2019 | 2017 | |
| Model | Toyota Land Cruiser V8 | Volkswagen Golf / GTI | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Wagon | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,850 mm | 2,629 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,950 mm | 4,562 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,979 mm | 1,798 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,880 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,638 kg | 1,389 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 93 L | 50 L | 43 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 973 mm | 980 mm | -7 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,549 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,509 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,090 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 988 mm | 980 mm | 8 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,552 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,488 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 874 mm | 904 mm | -30 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 909 mm | 0 mm | 909 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,582 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,438 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 719 mm | 0 mm | 719 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,682 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,951 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 456 L | 861 L | -405 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 1,218 L | 30.4 | -29.4 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 2,313 L | 1,883 L | 1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Toyota Land Cruiser V8
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Toyota Land Cruiser V8.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI
| 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | As I've noted before (when reviewing the e-Golf), the seventh-generation Golf's front seats are shaped and padded to provide nearly ideal comfort and support in daily driving. The CX-5's driver seat also fit me well, but not quite as well as the Volkswagen's. Compared to other compact hatchbacks and its ancestors, the current Golf has a roomy rear seat. I can sit behind my 5-9 self with about five inches of air ahead of my knees. Unless unusually tall people populate both rows, the amount of space should be beyond adequate. Compare the Golf SportWagen's rear seat to that in the CX-5, and a funny thing happens. On paper, the Mazda provides about 3.5 more inches of legroom. When sitting behind myself in both vehicles, though, I had about half as much space ahead of my knees in the CX-5. I've noticed in the past that VW measures rear legroom very conservatively, and apparently they continue to do so. The Golf's interior is roomier than the official specs suggest. Plus its rear seat passengers get air vents. The Mazda's do not. This said, I'm not entirely comfortable in the Golf SportWagen's rear seat. To me it feels overly reclined. In neither the GSW nor the CX-5 is the degree of recline adjustable. It is in some compact crossovers. see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI
| 2017 Volkswagen Golf / GTI Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2016 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 210hp 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Difficult ingress and egress see full Volkswagen Golf / GTI review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
