| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota Matrix and 2016 Audi A6 / S6 Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2016 | |
| Model | Toyota Matrix | Audi A6 / S6 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 102.4 in | 114.6 in | -12.2 in |
| Length | 171.9 in | 194.2 in | -22.3 in |
| Width | 69.5 in | 73.8 in | -4.3 in |
| Height | 61.4 in | 57.8 in | 3.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 2865 lb. | 3803 lb. | -938 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 19.8 gal. | -6.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.5 in | 37.2 in | 3.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 57.5 in | -4.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.3 in | 0.0 in | 52.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 41.3 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 37.8 in | 1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.6 in | 56.3 in | -3.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 43.7 in | 0.0 in | 43.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.2 in | 37.4 in | -1.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 78.7 in (over 2 rows) | -0.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 19.8 ft3 | 14.1 ft3 | 5.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 61.5 ft3 | 14.1 ft3 | 47.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Audi A6 / S6
| 2016 Audi A6 / S6 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | The second benefit of the Audi A6's more open and expansive interior: it feels roomier, especially in the front seats. With no "race car" or "jet fighter" pretensions, the Audi is easier and more relaxing to drive. The BMW, Cadillac, and Mercedes interiors all feel tighter and more confining. see full Audi A6 / S6 review | |
| 2016 Audi A6 / S6 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Want a second reason that the Audi A6 might not be your best bet? Perhaps its front seats, as these despite a four-way lumbar adjustment (driver only unless you get the 3.0T Prestige) are just okay. Though likely what a German orthopedist recommended--I've sat in these seats for ten hours without any soreness--I'd personally prefer seats that are less firm and more form-fitting. This said, forms differ, and the Audi's might fit yours better than mine. The rear seat is roomy but, like most, is mounted too close to the floor to provide adults with sufficient under-thigh support. With that, I'm pretty much out of why-nots (though I'll touch on a potential one below). A very good all-around car, the Audi A6 has no glaring faults. see full Audi A6 / S6 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Audi A6 / S6
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Audi A6 / S6.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
