| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Toyota Matrix and 2013 BMW X1 Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2013 | |
| Model | Toyota Matrix | BMW X1 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,761 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,366 mm | 4,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,765 mm | 1,798 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,560 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,300 kg | 1,600 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 63 L | -13 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,052 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 1,008 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 886 mm | 33 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,938 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 419 L | 142 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,741 L | 1,351 L | 0 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Toyota Matrix
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2012 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X1
| 2013 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | BMW makes great sport seats, with support in the right places and power-adjustable side bolsters. This said, those in the X1 Sport Line feel less cushy, and so less overtly comfortable, than I recall from other BMWs. The Evoque's front buckets lack adjustable side bolsters, but feel more luxurious. While the BMW wins on support, the Land Rover wins on comfort. Another tie. Update: when I later had an Evoque for a week its seats felt less comfortable than they had during the dealer test drive. So I'm revising this rating in favor of the BMW. see full BMW X1 review | |
| 2013 BMW X1 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The BMW X1's interior dimensions also closely resemble those of the previous-generation 3-Series. Up front, there's a little less space to stretch out than in the X3. But abundant headroom. About half of the X1's additional height is over one's head--you sit only a couple inches higher than in the 3-Series. This additional airspace also distinguishes the X1 from the allroad. Rear seat room could be more of an issue. As in the old 3 and the new allroad, a couple of average-sized adults will fit behind a couple more with perhaps an inch or two of clearance for their knees, while a third would be a squeeze. The seat back reclines, but the seat cushion is too low to provide good thigh support. The Evoque is similarly a less-than-ideal choice for four-plus adults taking a long trip. see full BMW X1 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW X1
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW X1.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
