Model Year | 2013 | 2011 | |
Model | Toyota Matrix | Chrysler 200 | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,766 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,366 mm | 4,869 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,765 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,560 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,300 kg | 1,537 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 64 L | -14 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 1,019 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,336 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 975 mm | 23 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 1,341 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 919 mm | 0 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,996 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 385 L | 176 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,741 L | 13.6 | -12.6 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Matrix.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2011 Chrysler 200.