| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota Matrix and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2012 | |
| Model | Toyota Matrix | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | 1.8L I4 DOHC-4v 132 hp@6000 128 lb-ft@4200 |
1.5L I4 OHC-4v 117 hp@6600 106 lb-ft@4800 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed manual | 5-speed manual | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 102.4 in | 98.4 in | 4 in |
| Length | 171.9 in | 161.6 in | 10.3 in |
| Width | 69.5 in | 66.7 in | 2.8 in |
| Height | 61.4 in | 60.0 in | 1.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 2865 lb. | 2496 lb. | 369 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 2.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.5 in | 40.4 in | 0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 52.7 in | 0.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.3 in | 51.5 in | 0.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 41.3 in | 0.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 39.0 in | 0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.6 in | 51.3 in | 1.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 43.7 in | 51.3 in | -7.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.2 in | 34.5 in | 1.7 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 19.8 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -0.8 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 61.5 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | 4.2 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
