| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota Matrix and 2019 Kia Stinger Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2019 | |
| Model | Toyota Matrix | Kia Stinger | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 102.4 in | 114.4 in | -12 in |
| Length | 171.9 in | 190.2 in | -18.3 in |
| Width | 69.5 in | 73.6 in | -4.1 in |
| Height | 61.4 in | 55.1 in | 6.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 2865 lb. | 3611 lb. | -746 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 15.9 gal. | -2.7 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.5 in | 38.3 in | 2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.3 in | 56.4 in | -3.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.3 in | 55.5 in | -3.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.6 in | 42.6 in | -1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.3 in | 37.0 in | 2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.6 in | 54.8 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 43.7 in | 56.1 in | -12.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.2 in | 36.4 in | -0.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 77.8 in (over 2 rows) | 79 in (over 2 rows) | -1.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 19.8 ft3 | 23.3 ft3 | -3.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 61.5 ft3 | 40.9 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Kia Stinger
| 2019 Kia Stinger Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2018 | Spring for the top-of-the-line Stinger GT2, and the Kia's driver seat gains power adjustments for its side bolsters and cushion length. The tested car was a GT1, yet I did not miss these adjustments. The seat fit me very well without them. I did miss the GT2's ventilated seats on hot days. And if your front seat passenger requires 4-way adjustable lumbar or either of you desires upgraded leather, then you'll also want the top trim. The tested Audi S5 Sportback was fitted with optional ventilated seats. Unfortunately, upgrading to these seats deletes the otherwise standard power-adjustable side bolsters (and massage function), and in this car I did miss having them. Compared to the Kia's, the Audi's seats are much firmer and not nearly as form-fitting. In my rating, I've assumed that the S5 Sportback's standard seats can be adjusted to provide better support than the optional ventilated seats. Otherwise I'd rate the Kia's front seats "much better." Moving to the back seat, in either car headroom should be just enough for adults up to about six feet in height. This is a big improvement over the initial iteration of the S5 Sportback. That car never made it to North America because of a severe rear headroom deficiency. When it comes to rear knee and leg room, the Stinger offers about two-and-a-half more inches. Rear seat passengers are likely to prefer the Kia, especially if they can't quite fit behind a tall driver in the S5. see full Kia Stinger review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Kia Stinger
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Kia Stinger.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
