| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Toyota Matrix and 2019 Mazda CX-5 Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2019 | |
| Model | Toyota Matrix | Mazda CX-5 | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 102.4 in | 106.2 in | -3.8 in |
| Length | 171.3 in | 179.1 in | -7.8 in |
| Width | 69.9 in | 72.5 in | -2.6 in |
| Height | 61.6 in | 65.3 in | -3.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 2679 lb. | 3541 lb. | -862 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.2 gal. | 14.8 gal. | -1.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 40.6 in | 39.7 in | 0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.2 in | 57.1 in | -3.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 51.7 in | 55.2 in | -3.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 41.0 in | 0.8 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.8 in | 39.0 in | 0.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.6 in | 54.8 in | -2.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 47.8 in | 55.3 in | -7.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 36.3 in | 39.6 in | -3.3 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.1 in (over 2 rows) | 80.6 in (over 2 rows) | -2.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 21.8 ft3 | 30.9 ft3 | -9.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 53.2 ft3 | 59.6 ft3 | -6.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Toyota Matrix
| 2007 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
a lot of place, even for tall people. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
very uncomfortable and not ergonomic at all. especially with child sits. see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2007 | 4dr Hatch 126-horsepower 1.8L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
Were flat and didnt grip you well see full Toyota Matrix review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5
| 2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
