Model Year | 2013 | 2013 | |
Model | Toyota Matrix | Tesla Model S | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,959 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,366 mm | 4,978 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,765 mm | 1,963 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,560 mm | 1,435 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,300 kg | 2,108 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 0 L | 50 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 897 mm | 101 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 899 mm | 20 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,984 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 895 L | -334 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,741 L | 1,795 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Toyota Matrix.
2013 Tesla Model S Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The front seats in the Tesla Model S are reasonably comfortable, but don't look or feel especially luxurious and provide little lateral support in turns. At least in the Performance model the side bolsters should be larger and/or adjustable. The seats in the A7 similarly need more aggressive bolsters. The seats in the S7 have them. see full Tesla Model S review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Tesla Model S.