| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Toyota Matrix and 2015 Toyota Highlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Toyota Matrix | Toyota Highlander | |
| Engine | 2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 118 kW@6000 220 Nm@4000 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 201 kW@6200 336 Nm@4700 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,601 mm | 2,789 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,366 mm | 4,854 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,765 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,560 mm | 1,730 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,390 kg | 1,920 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 50 L | 73 L | -23 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,029 mm | 1,034 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,354 mm | 1,506 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,453 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,057 mm | 1,123 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 998 mm | 1,013 mm | 997 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,336 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,110 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 919 mm | 975 mm | -56 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 912 mm | -912 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,397 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,158 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 704 mm | -704 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,976 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,802 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 561 L | 391 L | 170 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 19.8 | 1,198 L | 18.8 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,741 L | 2,370 L | -1 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Toyota Matrix
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat for a tall large guy is terrible this is why i got a BMW instead 2 years ago, my wife is using the Toyota see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2010 Toyota Matrix Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
The front seat is not rally confortable for a big 6foot 300 pound guy. I have long torso and some time get back pain in the middle after long driving... see full Toyota Matrix review |
| 2011 | 4dr Hatch 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic AWD |
front seat are horrible for an "high end" class (XRS) car ...
I considered getting rid of the car due to back pain, but my wife is using it now, I got a BMW
see full Toyota Matrix review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Highlander
| 2015 Toyota Highlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Toyota replaced the 2013 Highlander's rear struts with control arms to enable a three-inch-wider third-row seat, and then used the extra space to cram in a third seating position. So if you need seats for eight people, only the Highlander will do in this threesome. A top-of-the-line Santa Fe only seats six. Other eight-pass options include the Honda Pilot and GM's large crossovers. But those three people best be small, as the Highlander doesn't have nearly as much rear legroom as the Pathfinder or the Santa Fe. To fit children of even middling size in the third row it's necessary to slide the second row well forward. The second row seat cushion is mounted too low for adult comfort. The Nissan's second row suffers from a similar shortcoming, but the Hyundai's does not. see full Toyota Highlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Highlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Highlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
