Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
Model | Toyota Prius c | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Hatch | 2dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,550 mm | 2,436 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 3,995 mm | 4,079 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,694 mm | 1,740 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,455 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,132 kg | 1,196 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 36 L | 40 L | -4 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 937 mm | 43 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,328 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,295 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,059 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 940 mm | 0 mm | 940 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,313 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,290 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,948 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 484 L | 711 L | -227 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 0 L | 25.1 | -25.1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius c.
2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |