Model Year | 2016 | 2011 | |
Model | Toyota Prius v | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Wagon | 2dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,779 mm | 2,436 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,615 mm | 4,079 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,775 mm | 1,740 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,575 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,485 kg | 1,196 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 45 L | 40 L | 5 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 937 mm | -936 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,420 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,359 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,049 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 980 mm | 0 mm | 980 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,402 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,359 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 0 mm | 912 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,961 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 971 L | 711 L | 260 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,906 L | 25.1 | -24.1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius v.
2011 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |