Model Year | 2017 | 2007 | |
Model | Toyota Prius | Buick Terraza | |
Engine | 1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 71 kW@5200 142 Nm@3600 |
3.9L V6 OHV-2v 179 kW@6000 325 Nm@4800 |
|
Transmission | CVT | 4-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 3,076 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,539 mm | 5,207 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,760 mm | 1,910 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,476 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,395 kg | 2,008 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 43 L | 95 L | -52 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,011 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,397 mm | 1,521 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,097 mm | 1,013 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 988 mm | -38 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,346 mm | 1,554 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,565 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 848 mm | 988 mm | -140 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 968 mm | -968 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,234 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,227 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 919 mm | -919 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,921 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 697 L | 762 L | -65 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 24.6 | 2,098 L | 22.6 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,775 L | 3,865 L | -2 L |
2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review |
2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
2007 Buick Terraza Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 4dr Minivan, ext. 240-horsepower 3.9L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior seat configuration is abhorrant. Nigh impossbile to get to row 3 without hurting oneself. see full Buick Terraza review |