| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Toyota Prius and 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2006 | |
| Model | Toyota Prius | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,946 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,481 mm | 5,050 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,745 mm | 2,002 mm | -1 mm |
| Height | 1,491 mm | 1,900 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,380 kg | 2,281 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L | 98 L | -53 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 1,034 mm | 979 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,656 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,560 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 1,001 mm | 954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,349 mm | 1,654 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,300 mm | 1,557 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 914 mm | 980 mm | -66 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 950 mm | -950 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,636 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,245 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 693 mm | -693 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,994 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,723 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 612 L | 462 L | 150 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 21.6 | 1,801 L | 20.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,121 L | 2,962 L | -1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
| 2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
like riding first class in an airplane see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
There is plenty of space for all of the passengers and personal gear. The bucket seats add a lot of comfort. They also allow some extra room for third row passengers. Leather is the way to go, and the heated seats come in handy on those cold winter days. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
the best! had a back operation three years ago and this was thed only vehicle i am comfortable in see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 295-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
GMT800 series vehicles fit me better than any other. I prefer the '06 Tahoe to the '09 GMC Sierra i had prior to the Equinox i traded for the Tahoe. The Equinox was okay on a straight road, other than that, it was terrible! No lateral support at see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
| 2006 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 5.3L V8 4-speed automatic RWD |
inability to flat fold seat see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
