Model Year | 2017 | 2013 | |
Model | Toyota Prius | Ford Transit Connect | |
Engine | 1.8L I4 Hybrid DOHC-4v 95 hp@5200 105 lb-ft@3600 |
2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 136 hp@6300 128 lb-ft@4750 |
|
Transmission | CVT | 4-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr Minivan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,911 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,539 mm | 4,590 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,760 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,476 mm | 2,014 mm | -1 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,395 kg | 1,554 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 43 L | 58 L | -15 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,298 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,397 mm | 1,382 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,290 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,097 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 1,283 mm | 949 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,346 mm | 1,514 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,519 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 848 mm | 978 mm | -130 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,007 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 697 L | 2,212 L | 695 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,775 L | 3,831 L | -2 L |
2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review |
2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
2013 Ford Transit Connect Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Transit Connect's second-row bench is roomy and fairly comfortable for two people, but somewhat tight for three. The Sienna has another half-foot of shoulder room. Also, the seatback in the Ford's second row does not recline. If you do want captain's chairs, well, they're not an option. The situation worsens in the Ford's third row, which is less substantial and much lower to the floor than the third-row seats in the Honda or the Toyota. Unlike the Transit Connect's second row, its third-row seat does slide fore-aft (about six inches) and recline. Slide it all the way back, and legroom becomes almost generous. Still, it isn't a place many adults would want to spend much time. On top of this, it should be easier to open and close the Transit Connect's sliding doors and to get into its third row. The second row doesn't tip or slide forward like those in conventional minivans. Instead, it must be pushed to the floor in a fairly difficult two-step procedure. see full Ford Transit Connect review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 Ford Transit Connect.