Toyota Prius (2016) vs. Mazda CX-9 (2015) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2016 Toyota Prius and 2015 Mazda CX-9 specs.
2016 Toyota Prius and 2015 Mazda CX-9 Specifications
Model Year |
2016 |
2015 |
|
Model |
Toyota Prius |
Mazda CX-9 |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Hatch |
4dr SUV |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,700 mm |
2,875 mm |
0 mm |
Length |
4,539 mm |
5,095 mm |
-1 mm |
Width |
1,760 mm |
1,935 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,476 mm |
1,727 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,395 kg |
1,958 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
43 L |
76 L |
-33 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
1,001 mm |
1,006 mm |
0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,397 mm |
1,509 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,356 mm |
1,435 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,097 mm |
1,039 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
950 mm |
991 mm |
-41 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,346 mm |
1,491 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,318 mm |
1,422 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
848 mm |
1,011 mm |
847 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
899 mm |
-899 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,445 mm |
-1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 |
0 mm |
1,110 mm |
-1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 |
0 mm |
823 mm |
-823 mm |
Total Legroom |
1,946 mm (over 2 rows) |
2,873 mm (over 3 rows) |
-1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum |
697 L |
487 L |
210 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 |
24.6 |
1,368 L |
23.6 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum |
1,775 L |
2,852 L |
-1 L |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
2016 |
For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan.
The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable.
The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia.
Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX.
see full Toyota Prius review |
2016 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited.
Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility.
see full Toyota Prius review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Prius.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mazda CX-9
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mazda CX-9.
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all
Toyota models.