| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Toyota Prius and 2006 Nissan Pathfinder Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2006 | |
| Model | Toyota Prius | Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,539 mm | 4,765 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,760 mm | 1,849 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,476 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,395 kg | 1,984 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 43 L | 80 L | -37 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,001 mm | 1,016 mm | 0 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,397 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,356 mm | 1,410 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,097 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 950 mm | 1,013 mm | 949 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,346 mm | 1,483 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,318 mm | 1,463 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 848 mm | 869 mm | -21 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 932 mm | -932 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,450 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,118 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 714 mm | -714 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,946 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,659 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 697 L | 467 L | 230 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 24.6 | 1,393 L | 23.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,775 L | 2,243 L | -1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2017 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Toyota Prius.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Nissan Pathfinder
| 2006 Nissan Pathfinder Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Rear seat is cramped. I would gladly give up the third row seat, for more room for the rear (2nd row) seats. see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
| 2006 | 4dr SUV 270-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seating is small for long hauls, and seats WAY too hard see full Nissan Pathfinder review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
