| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2015 Toyota Prius and 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser Specifications
| Model Year | 2015 | 2006 | |
| Model | Toyota Prius | Toyota Land Cruiser | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,700 mm | 2,850 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,481 mm | 4,890 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,745 mm | 1,941 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,491 mm | 1,859 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,380 kg | 2,445 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L | 96 L | -51 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 996 mm | -16 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,394 mm | 1,585 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,339 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,074 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 955 mm | 993 mm | -38 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,349 mm | 1,554 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,300 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 914 mm | 871 mm | 43 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 925 mm | -925 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,554 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,430 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 693 mm | -693 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,994 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,639 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 612 L | 589 L | 23 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 21.6 | 1,110 L | 20.6 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,121 L | 2,571 L | -1 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
| 2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2016 | For a compact hatchback, the new Toyota Prius feels very roomy inside. It helps that the tall, sloping console of the third-generation Prius has been replaced by one with a much less intrusive (if also less sporty) design. The deep instrument panel is scooped out on top, while the windshield is large and distant. The view forward from the driver seat is very open, but anyone who isn't a goldfish will find it unusual. It's like driving a spaceship, in two senses. Or a small minivan. The Ford C-MAX has a crossover-like driving position and the most comfortable seats. The front seats in the Prius are nicely shaped, but less firm. Those in the Volt could use more contour. I found the Civic's front seats somewhat uncomfortable. The Volt feels far tighter inside. Up front the windshield seems far smaller than that in the Prius. The back seat, while its cushion is comfortably positioned, threatens to induce claustrophobia. Both the Prius and the Volt have restricted visbility to the sides and especially to the rear. The view is much better from the driver seat in the C-MAX. see full Toyota Prius review | |
| 2015 Toyota Prius Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Rear seat passengers in the Prius have far more knee room than those in the Volt, and feel far less closed in. Despite a low-mounted seat cushion, though, headroom is limited. Rear seat passengers in the C-MAX enjoy a much more comfortably positioned seat cushion, significantly more headroom, and better outward visibility. see full Toyota Prius review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Toyota Prius.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2006 Toyota Land Cruiser.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Toyota models.
